|
Chto
delat/What is to be done? was founded in early 2003 in Petersburg by a
workgroup of artists, critics, philosophers, and writers from Petersburg,
Moscow, and Nizhny Novgorod (see full list of participants on the web site)
with the goal of merging political theory, art, and activism.
Since then, Chto
delat has been publishing an English-Russian newspaper on issues central to
engaged culture, with a special focus on the relationship between a
repoliticization of Russian intellectual culture and its broader international
context. These newspapers are usually produced in the context of collective initiatives such as art projects or conferences.
The group was founded in May 2003 in Petersburg in an action called “The Refoundation of Petersburg
.” Shortly afterwards, the original, as yet nameless core group began
publishing a newspaper called Chto delat/What is to be done? The name
of the group derives from a novel by the Russian 19th author Nikolai
Chernyshevsky, and immediately brings reminiscences of the first
socialist worker’s self-organizations in Russia, which Lenin actualized
in his “What is to be done?” (1902). Chto delat sees itself as a
self-organizing platform for cultural workers intent on politicizing
their “knowledge production” through reflections and redefinitions of
an engaged autonomy for cultural practice today.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Upcoming Events and Publications |
|
Dmitry Vilensky will talk about self-education practices of Chto Delat at the workshop
Manufacturing Today in Vilnius; January 7-10th, 2009
This workshop in Vilnius is being organised as part of the project
Manufacturing Today, which also includes a workshop in Trondheim in May
2009, an exhibition/symposium in Trondheim in October 2009 and follow-on
events (TBC) in Helsinki, London, Malmö, and Vilnius.
Art education has been the subject of a great deal of art world
attention in the last couple of years. Factors such as the Bologna
process and the increased attention given to the regulation and
economisation of education; the temporarily overheated art market; the
net-enabled resurgence of the free universities and the renewed currency
of theories of autonomous education, have converged to temporarily
situate the idea of the art academy, its possible forms and its
alternatives, at the focus of the debate about the social role of art.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|